🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This move represents a clear response from the Kremlin against plans to utilize frozen Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on accounts in local state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to decide later this week regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and financial stability.

Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. They argue rests on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in European countries shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has labeled any use of the funds as theft. It has warned of reciprocal measures, including seizing EU corporate holdings within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear refused to comment on the new legal action. It has previously noted it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are developing measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European companies. They are also crafting safeguards to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the complex scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to repay the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an different method for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also significant," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that if you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."